Follow Up: Responding to Michele

Michele brought up interesting points from the articles. I definitely agree that while they bring up very true points backed by examples in history and in today’s society, they are missing other aspects that need to be addressed such as the stereotypes of being a male. As defined by Allan Johnson, a patriarchal society is male-centered and male-dominated. In such a society, the dominance of men and the subordination of women are perpetuated. Johnson argues that part of society is idea of “masculine protectiveness” and that “women are weak and men are strong.” Do people still disregard the problems still associated with female inequality? Are unconscious stereotypes still used, depicting females in a negative way? He adds, “Oppression of women happens because men want and like to dominate women.”
This notion of oppression in society relates to Frye's argument which looks at specific examples in society that appear innocent but are rather oppressive social rituals that encourage male dominance. I was very interested in her analysis of the “male-door opening ritual.” I, like Michelle, never thought of its severe negative connotations towards women. Through this example Frye indicates that sexism and racism can be perpetuated by people who are simply being nice. She writes, “The door-opening pretends to be a helpful service, but the helpfulness is false.” She argues that these services are only needed to people who are “incapacitated – unwell, burdened with parcels, etc.” Therefore, this action is showing that women are incapable.
Many people, like myself, do not find this act offensive. I do not think that because of the “male-door opening ritual” men are more important and influential than women. I think many women would agree that the man, by opening the door for a woman, is being a gentleman. Does this mean I am failing to see the oppression of women? Like Michele, I think Frye brings up interesting points that most people brush away. But then again I think she goes to extremes by addressing women’s incapability without ever touching on men and the issues they face.
Frye also makes an interesting remark when she discusses that the pain which individuals experience everyday is “self-internalized.” This is interesting because it reveals why many people do not understand how women can be oppressed because of their sex. This idea is important to understand because it reveals the need for a clear comprehension of the problem. I think so many conflicts arise out of ignorance and miscommunication. It is crucial for education to take place so we can achieve true equality between the sexes.